This blog is from one of COBIS' Supporting Associates

Written by Ella Savell-Boss, Safeguarding Consultant

Child protection and safeguarding measures are essential for ensuring the safety and well-being of children and young people. Traditionally, these measures have focused on protecting children from harm within the home, such as abuse and neglect by parents/carers. 

However, in recent years, there has been a shift towards a more contextual approach to safeguarding, which recognises that children and youth may also be at risk of harm outside of the home. This shift has been led by Dr Carlene Firmin and her team at Durham University.

This isn’t a new framework or definition; Contextual Safeguarding is a new way of thinking about safety and assessing risk.

When we consider some of the children we may have worked with and supported, these risks could include exploitation, knife crime, radicalisation and sexual harassment. We might also think about the risks facing (all young people but particularly) young women and the LGBTQ+ community such as catcalling, up-skirting and cyber-flashing. These risks may occur outside of the home and in community settings such as schools, online spaces, and peer groups.

This quote by Mixed Martial Arts champion Leon Edwards, about his childhood:

 “There were shootouts around me,” he says.

“You had to run and hide. It’s weird because you kind of get used to it, living in this mad warzone, you know? I’ve got a son now who’s nine and I couldn’t imagine him in that environment.

“But at the time you hear gunshots. You’re like ‘OK, no-one got hit and no-one died’, so you’re back out playing again. It just becomes normal.”

We may ourselves have worked with children for whom all manner of harms ‘just become normal’. 

By considering the context in which harm occurs, contextual safeguarding can help identify and intervene in situations that may not have been identified through traditional safeguarding approaches. 

One of the key components of contextual safeguarding is the involvement of the community in identifying and addressing risks. This can include engaging with parents, caregivers, and community leaders to identify and address potential risks, as well as working with children and young people themselves to build resilience and protective factors.

As safeguarding professionals in schools and education settings, we often find that the most crucial pieces of information that enable us to ‘crack the case’ of a child we have been worried about, come from their peers or the child themselves. 

It can be easy to dismiss teenage gossip, overheard conversations and scribbled notes that might be passed in the classroom, and yet, it’s often here that we find out what our students are most concerned about amongst each other.

To put it bluntly, if a teenager, with a still-developing pre-frontal cortex, thinks something is a risk (to themselves or a friend) we need to sit up and take note.

Historically, it has been easy to assume that many risks do not affect children from more affluent communities. While that has always been untrue (!), the internet has now unfortunately become a great leveller when it comes to risks facing young people. Therefore, taking into account online safety whenever we assess a child’s risk is key, even when the presenting issue is not an online one.

In addition, there are some key elements when it comes to thinking with a “contextual hat on”. These elements, particularly regarding peer dynamics and community norms enable us to spot potential risks that have been hiding in plain sight:

1. Traditional safeguarding focuses on individual vulnerabilities, whereas Contextual safeguarding asks: “What is it about this environment that makes harm more likely?”
2. Young people may adopt risky behaviours to fit in or be influenced by peers and community norms, not necessarily because of issues at home.
3. Understanding context helps staff identify and address where harm occurs, not just who caused it. Staff should learn to assess peer dynamics, location safety, and community influences, not just a behaviour. The goal is systemic safety, not just individual intervention.
4. Contextual Safeguarding approaches value young people’s voices. Professionals should exercise curiosity, open questions, and trust-building to gather this insight, and avoid blame.

Of course, contextual safeguarding also requires a multi-agency approach. Forming strong working relationships with other agencies does not just make our working life easier and more pleasant, it could just save young people’s lives.

Implementing contextual safeguarding can be challenging, as it requires a shift in thinking from traditional approaches to child protection and a willingness to work with the community to identify and address risks. We need to broaden our horizons, potentially ask more difficult questions and be willing to sit down with others and really ‘map’ the risks. 

By considering the broader context in which harm occurs, we can more effectively protect children and young people from all modern harms and promote their well-being.